Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Star Wars.. Again
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
So, theaters are feeling threatened...
Hollywood has decided to experiment with a 60 day window for theatrical films before those films are put on a premium video on demand service, where you the movie-going public can watch the movie from the comfort of your own homes for a mere $30. This is try and make up for the declining DVD revenue.
Theaters are naturally upset over this development, since it cuts into their share of the small revenue they get from the already shrinking box office. This makes me wonder if The time of the multiplex has almost reached the end.
For me (I can't really talk for anyone else, so why try) I really have to be convinced by quite a few people over the whole "Theatre Experience", where I can see a movie with state of the art projection and sound.
I have a projection and sound system that rivals any theatre in my area. The difference between staying at home and going to a theatre is that I can control my environment at home. In the theatre I have to put up with:
- High admission prices
- insanely high concession prices
- sitting with the most rude group of people that I can meet.
At home I can invite people over, and maintain a theatre going experience minus the talking and texting. The snacks are healthier, and the projection is better than the theaters.
Personally, I wouldn't mind having a few people over to help cover the cost of the showing, and actually make it a group experience.
Friday, April 09, 2010
Long Time no talk
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
We've hit the 21st century finally
digital 3D.
No, I'm not excited about the movie, I am excited about the fact that
my town has finally got onto the digital age.
I'll miss some things.. The grain film has, the warmth of the picture,
but Im interested in the technology.
Thursday, June 21, 2007
OK.. Hollywood isn't that dead to me.

The revised AFI List of the top 100 American movies of the past 100 years was announced yesterday, and as was expected CITIZEN KANE was still considered the greatest American film of all time. Since then, I've had quite a few emails from people saying that they've rented it, and were disappointed, and asked what the big deal is about the movie. Here's what I've been telling people:
In 1941 a first-time director; a cynical, hard-drinking writer; an innovative cinematographer, and a group of New York stage and radio actors were given the keys to a studio and total control, and made a masterpiece. ``Citizen Kane'' is a gathering of all the lessons of the emerging era of sound, just as ``Birth of a Nation'' assembled everything learned at the height of the silent era, and ``2001'' pointed the way beyond narrative. These peaks stand above all the others.
The movie opens with newsreel obituary footage that briefs us on the life and times of Charles Foster Kane; this footage, with its portentous narration, provides a map of Kane's trajectory, and it will keep us oriented as the screenplay skips around in time, piecing together the memories of those who knew him. The structure is circular, adding more depth every time it passes over his life.
The movie is filled with visual moments of brilliance: the towers of Xanadu; the doorway of Kanes mistress dissolving into a front-page photo in a rival newspaper; the camera swooping down through a skylight toward the pathetic Susan in a nightclub; the boy playing in the snow in the background as his parents determine his future; the great shot as the camera rises straight up from Susan's opera debut to a stagehand holding his nose, and the subsequent shot of Kane, his face hidden in shadow, defiantly applauding in the silent hall.
It's imagery like this, along with editing and the story that makes CITIZEN KANE great - even after your 130th viewing there's always something new that you'll notice. The fact that this holds true after 66 years is what makes CITIZEN KANE easily the greatest film of all time.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
My Oscar Picks
Best Picture:
Letters from Iwo Jima
I'm picking this against my Gut Feeling which is that maybe, just MAYBE Little Miss Sunshine could take it. It would be like Crash last year - Brokeback was the sure thing, but Crash came out of nowhere.
Best Director:
Martin Scorcese - The Departed. Why? It's his time.
Best Actor:
Forest Whitaker - Last King of Scotland. You can't stem the Tide. I agree with Hobson tho'.. O'Toole should win, since he had the better performance. I wouldn't count out Will Smith either.
Best Actress:
Helen Mirren - The Queen. Again, you can't stem the tide. However Judi Dench SHOULD win, her performance was incredible.
Best Supporting Actress:
Jennifer Hudson - Dreamgirls. See above. Momentum is there. Although, If Abigail Breslin won for Little Miss Sunshine I wouldn't swear at the Academy.
Best Supporting Actor:
It really pains me to say this.. Eddie Murphy - Dreamgirls. Mark Wahlberg will get the Fuzzy End of the Lollipop this year.
So, those are mine.. What are yours?
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
There is 32 minutes to Oscar Nominations
Best Picture:
The Departed
Babel
Dreamgirls
Little Miss Sunshine
The Queen
Best Director:
Martin Scorsese, "The Departed"
Bill Condon, "Dreamgirls"
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, "Babel"
Clint Eastwood, "Letters From Iwo Jima"
Stephen Frears – “The Queen”
Best Actor:
Forest Whitaker, "The Last King of Scotland"
Peter O'Toole, "Venus"
Leonardo DiCaprio, "The Departed"
Will Smith, "The Pursuit of Happyness"
Ryan Gosling, "Half Nelson"
Best Actress:
Helen Mirren, "The Queen"
Meryl Streep, "The Devil Wears Prada"
Judi Dench, "Notes on a Scandal"
Penelope Cruz, "Volver"
Kate Winslet, "Little Children"
Supporting Actor:
Eddie Murphy – Dreamgirls
Alan Arkin, "Little Miss Sunshine"
Jack Nicholson,"The Departed"
Brad Pitt, "Babel"
Jackie Earle Haley, "Little Children"
Supporting Actress:
Jennifer Hudson, "Dreamgirls"
Cate Blanchett, "Notes On A Scandal"
Rinko Kinkuchi, "Babel"
Adriana Barraza, "Babel"
Abigail Breslin, "Little Miss Sunshine"
There may be a dark horse in the race for best picture.. it's a long shot.. but UNITED 93 may be nominated.
Those are my picks... what are yours? How do we compare?
Monday, January 22, 2007
Every few years, foreign films

comes out that breaks the bounds of language. Films like Roberto Begnini's Life Is Beautiful, or last year, when the latest film by Pedro Almodóvar, Volver Starring Penelope Cruise. These films seem to break the boundries between Art Films and Mainstream, and get a large following.
The foreign film that's doing this year is Guillermo del Toro (Hellboy) latest film Pan's Labyrinth (El Laberinto del Fauno). A stunning film that's just starting to hit wide release.
The story is set in Spain in 1944 as Franco's victorious fascist forces bear down with punishing weight on any who resist. The film's extraordinary fantasy sequences, in which the girl must complete three arduous tasks, offer a semblance of hope and salvation compared to the short life expectancy in a merciless military state. The film begins with a prologue about the fate of a long-lost princess and the promise of her return. As the tale is told, a pregnant and sickly woman, Carmen (Ariadna Gil) and her daughter Ofelia (Ivana Baquero) arrive at a military outpost commanded by Carmen's officious new husband, Capt. Vidal (Sergi Lopez). Ofelia still pines for her late father while her mother entreats her to embrace the stiff and unpleasant captain although it soon becomes apparent that he is more interested in fathering a son than in being a husband or father to the girl.
Worse than this, the Captain reveals himself as a monster who kills captured rebels with extreme brutality and utter disdain for their existence. The camp is threatened by a gathering number of guerillas aided secretly by their leader's sister, Mercedes (Maribel Verdu), who is the Captain's chief housekeeper.
As the world around Ophelia becomes more and more violent, she becomes captivated by fairies that lead her to an ancient maze leading down to a labyrinth where she encounters a fearsome but talkative faun (Doug Jones). He claims she is a legendary lost princess and she must pass three tests in order to claim immortality.
Ophelia's mother fights with an increasingly difficult pregnancy while Ophelia fights with the challenges and the Captain finds even more gruesome ways to deal with the Guerilla's. Ophelia's adventures seem as real to her as the horrors around her, and it's to Guillermo del Toro's credit that he can weave the 2 worlds together convincingly.
The visual style of the film is mesmerizing and the drama of the military camp has its horrifying moments of torture and death, as well as the scene when the captain has to stitch his cheek together after being slashed by an assailant.
Pan's Labyrinth to me has what most hollywood films is missing - Originality and imagination. Guillermo del Toro has created a wicked wonderland of horror and fascintation, a film that transcends the bounds of language, and presents a story that is beautiful and surrealistic, it's like Lewis Carrol met Salvador Dali and Luis Buñuel. This is one of those rare films that is a must see.
Pan's Labyrinth - A
Saturday, January 13, 2007
It's been a while since I've

blogged, because I've been selfishly self-absorbed trying to determine what I'm going to do with the rest of my life, and that means I'm going to be starting my own Pursuit of Happiness soon.
I think partly to try and get me motivated, my girlfriend and I decided to go see someone else's story of being down on their luck and coming out ok. You know.. a "pick me up" kind of thing.
So off we went to see Will Smith portray the actual Chris Gardner, He is a bright guy starting to feel some age, with limited prospects – he sells bone-scanning equipment to doctors but is often rejected, since the Doctors think of the machines as an "unnecessary luxury" He's trapped by the machines, which is the sole support for himself and his family.
One day he walks buy a building and sees a bunch of smiling people coming out and thinks.. "Those guys are happy, what can't I be happy too?"
Well, for starters, his wife Linda (played by Thandie Newton) is becoming a scarecrow of overworked anxiety, and is just looking for a reason to get out. The only saving grace Chris has is his son Christopher, who gets left at a day care nest in Chinatown, and the cheapness of the place is one of many abrasions that finally drive Linda away. The rest of the story features father-son bonding, very effective because it's almost never pushed cloyingly, and because Jaden Christopher Syre Smith, Will's son, fits like a kid glove.
So, Chris starts schmoozing, trainee program for aspiring brokers at Dean Witter. But he can only survive the long tryout by selling the damn machines, which rarely sell. By now he's a single parent, and his son misses mom and the apartment Chris couldn't pay for, and none of the chirpy suits at Dean Witter realize that brisk, affable Chris is scraping by on nerve and small change.
Director Gabriele Muccino gets some charm from bits like the Rubik's Cube or a lost shoe, but nothing softens the pain of being down to $12.44 or living in a shelter. At rock bottom, Chris enlists his son's childish imagination to patch their spirits together.
By all counts a guy like Chris should, by the odds, have more friends or relatives as backup. But the story shows human strength, partly because Smith shows credible weakness when he must. Will Smith as always been good in comedy, and he started to show maturity in drama with “Ali,” and this wonderfully subtle, engaging but never drippy performance again deepens his range and appeal.
The Pursuit of Happyness isn't earth shattering in it's delivery, nor is it unpredictable. You KNOW what happens, but it doesn't mean that it isn't moving at the end. It's one of the few movies made in America that deal with people live and survive.
The Pursuit of Happyness - B
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Bond.. James Bond

You may all laugh and think "Yea Whatever" when I mention this, but here it goes..
almost a year ago I was sitting around at work talking with some people, and the subject of James Bond Came up. What we decided at that time was the following..
Ewan MacGregor set in the 1960's.. at the Beginning! Before he became a badass..
Flash forward a year... to the release of Casino Royale.. Where..
Daniel Craig (Layer Cake) plays a young James Bond.. not even with "Double 'O'" Status yet.. giving the series a very badly needed reboot.
Casino Royale is James Bond's first mission, where he must stop a banker from winning a casino tournament and using the prize money to fund terrorist activities.
This is what the series has needed so badly. going back to the basics, stop making bond a parody, and get back to the beginning. Danil Craig got a lot of flack for being picked as Bond, but I think he captures the essence of Bond perfectly. You learn so much about the character, his motivation for the rest of the series... Why he's so cold hearted, why he trusts no one.
In this movie, Bond isn't a super-hero, he has flaws.. he doesn't mind getting hurt, he's human.
I really wish that now they go back and revisit the earlier Bonds now and do things right.
Casino Royale: B
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Yes, it has been a while...again.

This time around, Williams plays a comedian with a show much like the Daily Show with Jon Stewart, who decides to run for president and wins.
That's the premise that the marketing people WANT you to think, but it's sort of false advertising. Yes, that's the abridged version, but there's a little more to it than that. It's part political satire, part thriller and it falls apart because of it, unfortunately.
Barry Levinson, who wrote and directed the film tries to make a movie with the same biting commentary that his previous political satire WAG THE DOG had, but just doesn't have the bite. Robin Williams is given his chance to improvise, but in the end, the movie doesn't do or say much.
Man of the Year - D

As everyone knows by now, the movie is based on the true story of 2 harbor patrol officers that went in to try and evacuate people from the World Trade Center the morning the planes hit. They get trapped when the building collapses around them, and it shows what happens during the aftermath.
Director Oliver Stone has made a respectful film, and centers only on the 2 cops, played by Nicholas Cage and Michael Pena. The story doesn't focus on the planes, or try to have the events glorified, we are left in the dark, just like the 2 cops. The story told in WORLD TRADE CENTER is that of the 2 cops, nothing else. Because of this, the movie shows respect, and in my opinion doesn't glorify anything.
World Trade Center - B
Monday, August 21, 2006
Wanna Join a group?
Do you see movies, and DON'T live in the Calgary area? Wish you could chat about the movies you see with people from around the globe? Well, now's your chance.
Our group has started an online forum. It's located at http://screenclub.forumup.net . All you have to do is register, and start talking away!
Hope to see you online there!
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Monster House?

This summer along comes Monster House, a new animated movie produced by Spielberg and Robert Zemeckis (Polar Express) that holds the potential of being so much more than it is, but is still satisfying in an odd way.
Monster House is about three teens that discover that their neighbor's house is really a living, breathing, scary monster that eats everything that lands on it's property. The kids try and convince the adults, then decide to go in and try to solve the mystery of the house. We follow their adventures, and (if you're 11 years old or YOUNGER) get thrilled along the way.
The movie is done in the same kind of motion capture technique that Robert Zemeckis used in Polar Express, only this time the computer generated people in the movie don't have that creepy "exhibits from the Hollywood wax museum come to life" feel to them. Director Gil Kenan brings a movie that had a great cast at his fingertips (Kathleen Turner, Steve Buscemi, Jason Lee to name a few), and gives us a movie that drags at the start, but picks up speed towards the end that made me think of GOONIES. The kids were happy at the end.
This is a PERFECT first horror movie for the younger set: scary enough to make them jump, yet not so scary they'll be sleeping in their parents bed for months after. At the screening I was at all the kids younger than 9 were shrieking in delight at every turn. There were 2 lines in the movie that were directly aimed at grownups and there was laughing from the parents that brought their kids.
But you know.. during the ENTIRE time I was in the theatre, I couldn't help but wonder how it would play out as a live action movie. Poltergeist came into my mind a lot as I reimagined Monster House as a live action popcorn thriller, where real people are being terrorized by a computer generated house. I saw a lot of potential that way.
However, that isn't the product on the screen. From what is on the screen, most parents will find the movie a grind to sit through, where children will find it a safe scary movie. harmless fun all around.
Monster House - C
Calgary Screening Club
It would be great to see it grow, and form a group of people who enjoy seeing and discussing films.
Friday, June 30, 2006
I remember back in 1978,

seeing Richard Donner's SUPERMAN for the first time, and leaving the theatre thinking "Holy Crap a man CAN fly"! After this first film, Superman 2 came out, then the other sequels that really didn't make much of an impression, in fact, for the purposes of this post, let's pretend they DIDN'T even happen.. they were just a bad dream. Unfortunately, those sequels pretty much killed the Superman Franchise, and its laid dormant for over 20 years.
Now, after this long hiatus, and with a TON of fanfare, Warner has resurrected the Superman franchise with director Bryan Singer jumping ship from the X-Men franchise (unfortunately) to bring the man of steel back to the screen in SUPERMAN RETURNS.
Singer dispenses with backstory trying to tell the origins of Superman, and jumps right in to the story, which gives this a feel of a CONTINUATION of Donner's Superman and of course Superman 2. Superman goes back to check out the remnants of his home planet, and comes home after being gone for 5 years. When he returns, he finds a different world and Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth) now has a son, is engaged to be married, and has won a Pulitzer for her article "Why the World doesn't need Superman". Also coming back into the picture is Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey) who wants revenge on the man of steel.
SUPERMAN RETURNS not only tries to deal with the SUPER in Superman, but the MAN as well. Singer has given Superman/Clark Kent an inner conflict, where he has to deal with his emotions of finding out that Lois has moved on, and also keeping up with his fighting the bad guys. The movie is sometimes a little too heavy handed, using the "Christ" metaphor a little to liberally.. with shots of Superman falling to earth, arms outstretched like he's being crucified, and dialog like "You say that the world doesn't need a saviour, but every night I hear people calling for one". There is also the shot of Superman in a pose like the God Atlas. When you see the movie, you'll get all the religious references.
What you might also get are all the HOMAGES to all the different incarnations of Superman himself, especially the Donner film, which starts with the opening credits, and sprays them liberally throughout, even down to the pacing, which is almost the same as the '78 version.
Some critics have said that the movie has lost the "fun" aspect of the Donner film by bringing the Human aspect into Superman. I disagree with that. I think what Singer has done is try to pull off a balancing act with this movie.. Kickstart the Superman franchise after a 19 year absence, while trying to make the movie a homage to all the other incarnations before it. I think he did a good job.
Superman Returns: B
As I noted in an earlier post, Superman Returns is the first film that uses the new IMAX process of converting a film shot normally into 3D. The 20 minutes of footage in 3D I thought looked impressive. If you've seen it in 3D, tell me what you thought of it.
Thursday, June 22, 2006
I like Jack Black.. he can

be a funny guy. School of Rock was good, he was also good in Hi-Fidelity, Even in Peter Jackson's KING KONG, He brough Carl Denham a smug sense of humour. In my mind, Jack Black is one of those guys you see in a movie, and can't help but smile when he's on screen.
Which makes me ask why in the name of GAWD did he end up in this steaming TURD of a movie?
Nacho Libre has Jack Black playing a monk that lives near a small village in Mexico, serves crap to orphans, has a crush on a nun, and takes on a secret life as a masked wrestler. That's the setup.
The problem with this movie is that it's a one line joke, stretched out and never gives the payoff. It isn't Jack Black's fault. It's the movie.. it never takes off. The problem is there's no content.. It's disjointed... things happen, but it's like someone stuck in a VERY deep rut in their life.. they go through the motions, with nothing ever really happening. The basic rule of a COMEDY is that there has to be at least some jokes that hit the mark. The gags in Nacho Libre have set-ups, but no payoff.. it's like this:
Here's a joke: A guy walks into a bar with a duck and sits down.. Has a drink.. Then leaves.
See... a set-up.. but no payoff. In a COMEDY, that isn't a good thing. Now imagine the above example happening for 80 MINUTES, and you're sitting there... waiting.
Its been 24 hours since I've seen the movie, and I'm still shaking my head. Director Jared Hess who made NAPOLEON DYNAMITE shows he has promise with that movie, and one of the screenwriters was Mike White, who wrote School of Rock, The Good Girl, Orange County and a few others. He has talent as well... I just can't put my finger on who's to blame for this movie, all I know is its the first time I didn't smile when I saw Jack Black on screen in quite a while.
This movie is like a 80 minute joke... only without the funny part, and told really badly, with some fart noises thrown in to try and save it..
Nacho Libre: F-
Sunday, June 11, 2006
Do you live in the Calgary Area?
If you do, I'm thinking about starting an informal movie discussion group. It's a group where people who like movies can get together, go see a movie and then head out and discuss the film with other people over coffee.
If your interested, send an email to gicalgary@gmail.com to be subscribed to learn more information as we start things up
Saturday, June 10, 2006
Before going to see
Keillor concocted the screenplay about a radio show very much like the one he's been broadcasting since July 1974 from St. Paul, Minn. With the exception of scenes in a diner, The entire movies takes place as a "fictional" show prepares for the last show before the theatre they use is torn down by the Texas conglomerate for a parking lot.
But no big deal is made of the occasion, as the cast treats it like it's just another show. Robert Altman follows the various performers both onstage and backstage, capturing their quirks and private agendas, as their personal and private lives mix.
Its a tool Altman has used many times, including in his films about other artistic backdrops, such as "The Company" (dance), "Kansas City" (jazz), "Ready-to-Wear" (fashion), "The Player" (film), "Vincent & Theo" (painting) and "Nashville" (country music). Altman's first significant professional job was as a radio writer, and while the film doesn't concern itself with the craft and mechanics, there is a comfort with the setting that dovetails with Altman's evident delight in the performers he's put in front of the camera.
Many of the characters are carried over from Keillor's actual radio show: cowboy crooners Dusty and Lefty (Woody Harrelson, John C. Reilly), whose ongoing banter culminates in a final number, "Bad Jokes," in which the off-color lyrics are indeed as bad as they are hilarious. Adding more down-home flavor is L.Q. Jones as a vet country singer. Private Detective "Guy Noir" I'm told is one of the COMPANION'S most long time and memorable characters, and for the context of the movie is slightly rejigged as a chronically underemployed P.I., who does security for the show. The part is played wonderfully by Kevin Kline in 40's threads and attitudes.
As well as being narrator, Guy is supposed to keep an eye on things but gets distracted by a mysterious blonde (Virginia Madsen) who materializes to incorporate herself into the proceedings in unforeseeable ways.
But the most prominent characterss here are Yolanda and Rhonda Johnson (Meryl Streep, Lily Tomlin), the surviving half of what used to be a promising quartet of sisters. In the company of Yolanda's teen daughter Lola (Lindsay Lohan), who writes suicide poetry, the two gals yack on in wacky ways about family, special memories and disappointments.
All through the show, GK refuses to acknowledge that it's the finale. "Every show's your last show. That's my philosophy," he explains. Nor will he mention it when one cast member dies offstage during the broadcast; "I don't do eulogies." Where these quips may have come from Keillor, I can imagine what kind of meanings they would have for Altman, who was 80 when he filmed the movie. The films fleeting style doesn't betray for a moment. The spectre of death, or something like it hangs over the project but in a light way, as if ignoring it is the only thing to do.
The humour comes from many places in the film, but first and foremost is Kline whose comic timing in an uproariously silly phone scene, brings him almost in a class that could be compared to Cary Grant, and Woody Harrelson, who has a deadpan style that shines in every scene he's in.
All in all, A PRAIRIE HOME COMPANION is Altman's loving look at a slice of Americana, and brings me back to his other work, and this can be held up among them with no shame.
A PRAIRIE HOME COMPANION: B